The legalization of LGBTQ in Israel in 1988 ushered in the local homosexual legal revolution. It transformed the political opportunity structure, which resulted in legislation revisions, the establishment of flourishing social movements, and normative LGBT culture. The majority of events took place in Tel Aviv, with other dispersed movements in other cities. From 1988, continued political and legal action has been carried out, focusing on integration policy. Tel Aviv is consistently ranked among the world’s most transgendered places. Israel is recognized as the most open-minded Middle East Nation, particularly regarding LGBT issues.
Nonetheless, some opponents argue that the Israeli community is not as advanced as the government depicts. Currently, Israel does not recognize homosexual relationships, and a sizable percentage of the Society considers the LGBT society a shame. The relationship involving the state and Israel’s publicly Jewish’s more progressive character is noteworthy since they are frequently at odds. Consequently, some of the country’s efforts look to be more like intentional endeavors to advertise itself to the Western nations than genuine socio-economic advancements (Stelder, pg. 443).
Gay Identity Silencing
In the past, Israel had a few public conversations with bisexual Jews who were compelled to live in secret. After the British Colony ended, the Israel system of law adopted the original anti-sodomy British legislation, which declared simply that ” Any guy who allows another man to have sexual relations with him faces up to ten years in jail.” because of its impracticality, the rule was rarely fully enforced; however, the institutionalization of anti-sodomy attitudes resulted to many gay Jews into hiding. This opinion remained for years, with Israel’s Minister of Internal Affairs declaring in the 1960s that the word “gay Jews” was just a contradiction because the Bible forbade such activity as an iniquity.
Three significant cultural factors also had a role in the general concealment, which some researchers refer to as Terra Incognita for homosexual males. Initially, Zionism believed that common social concerns, like security from Arabs, should be prioritized and prioritized over individual needs because it shattered the required homogeneity of communal existence; homosexuality was an individual need. Second, revisionist Zionism stressed the hyper-masculine ideal, which homosexuals allegedly threatened. Lastly, Israel needed more children, which homosexual men couldn’t supply. As a result, homosexual Jews were viewed negatively from both an ideological and practical standpoint as sexual perverts who “illogically violated the beloved ethos and may thereby contribute to the downfall of the glorious nation.” (Crouse, pg. 47).
For so many decades, any talk of homosexuality was promptly repressed or disregarded as a harmful thought that would corrupt Jewish children’s minds, but this began to shift in the world of art. Yotam Reuveni, in 1976, published a book on his experiences as a homosexual guy. Reuveni is today regarded as the guy who authored the homosexual Scriptures before Israel understood the meaning of ‘gay.’ Although the book did not offer a fresh description of the LGBT movement, it was also the first fiction to do so in Hebrew. Following the publication of his book, art exploring these themes proliferated. Amos Gutman, for example, produced Afflicted in 1983, about a perplexed homosexual man who finally enters the realm of gay drag queens. The video delves into the dark life of a lonely homosexual guy, a well-known tale in the LGBT society.
Following the spread of LGBTQ publications, the homosexual Society started to demonstrate indications of the development and establishment of unified groups. SPPR, which stands for Society for the Protection of Personal Rights, was founded in 1975 to offer network support, a point of community identity for a motley mélange of disjointed persons, and a center of social activities. Because of the constant stigmatization, the organization originally struggled to develop its membership. The modest, rather divided SPPR group, on the other hand, would become the spine of the major LGBTQ associations present in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv nowadays, for instance, the Aguda. SPPR’s first gathering in Tel Aviv’s City Hall Square in 1979 was a watershed moment in assisting Israeli activists in coming out of hiding to support the cause. It paved the a for today’s well-attended Pride Parades (Crouse, pg. 52).
The Evolution of Israeli Gay Identity
Attempts to amend Israel’s law code began quickly after smaller activist organizations focused on homosexuality. A Knesset (MK) member attempted to repeal the anti-sodomy clause in 1971. Orthodox Jews, who have traditionally served in the Knesset, were opposed to the endeavor for ideological reasons. Seven years later, five MKs attempted it again. It was another failure. Undaunted, several MKs were successful in 1988; although repealing the legislation had minimal realistic consequences, it was unquestionably an intellectual success. Indeed, decriminalization resurrected the SPPR group (which had begun to fade from public notice) and centered public dialogue on these concerns.
The establishment of a huge advocacy congress known as Otzma, which meant “power” in Hebrew, was a significant effect of the legalization. Otzma advocated for various progressive measures, comprising equal rights for partners of the same sex, and held meet-ups to raise awareness of its concerns. High-ranking officials attended these events, including Likud MK Rubi Rivlin, who said, “He will not battle for homophobia, but he will battle for everybody who desires to live that way.” Rivlin did not push the homosexual lifestyle, but his determination to support the group despite his claims to the contrary was substantial. Otzma is currently the umbrella organization’s legal and political arm. In Israel, the establishment of the Unified Israel LGBT group is still responsible for lobbying and legislative operations. Still, it now provides legal support to people who have been discriminated against (Izraeli, pg. 283).
The environment of significant societal shifts in views about homosexuality corresponded with significant legislative developments. The Workplace Equality Law was revised in 1992 to specify that sexual orientation cannot be used to discriminate against employees. Soon after, a Supreme Court decision granted homosexual couples complete equality. In the hearing, Vice President Barak posed the question, “Is life a partnership between partners of homosexuals any different from a life of partnership between spouses of different genders in terms of fraternity, collaboration, and social unit management?” The topic has been raised in numerous contexts, including in the USA. In addition, Israel Defense Forces repealed the prohibition on homosexual troops in 1993; since Israel Defense Force service is compulsory and embedded in the structure of the Israeli community, LGBT youngsters in Israel were eventually they were permitted to function as critical socialization agents, assisting in their integration into society. Before, IDF troops convicted of homosexuality were classed as “mentally sick” and subjected to further mental examination. If one is accused of homosexuality, one’s rank may be removed. In contrast, the IDF is now relatively LGBT-friendly, and many homosexual troops serve in elite divisions (Izraeli, pg. 287).
National Statistics and Trends
Greater tolerance of homosexuality in major places like Jerusalem and Tel Aviv has greatly mirrored legislative progress, but national figures reveal an, unlike narrative. In accordance with a 2013 poll, 47 percent of Israelis said “no” to the question “Should community tolerate LGBT?” while 40 percent said “yes.” For instance, in the States of America, 33 percent of respondents said “no,” and 60 percent said “yes,” comparable to other Western Hemisphere nations. This survey also found that while homosexuality is widely accepted in North America and the EU, it is widely rejected in Muslim countries and Africa. In Israel’s neighboring countries of Lebanon, Egypt, and Jordan, 80-90 percent of residents believe the community should not allow bisexuals, while about 10 percent believe the contrary, a significant disparity(Belkin and Levitt, pg.544).
Young Israelis’ attitudes about homosexuality are also relevant, as trends in the youngsters will impact the future direction of LGBT rights. Intergenerational transmission of ideas toward “traditional marriage life” is particularly high in Israel, according to a 2004 research. The study focuses on 15-year-old kids who are in their formative years. Surprisingly, the poll also discovers that, while attitudes regarding gender norms and divorce stay relatively similar throughout decades, perceptions toward homophobia are more accepted among the younger generation. Hence, while family custom is still important, this intergenerational study reveals an increasing tendency toward leniency. According to a 2011 study, millennial homosexual participants express a higher level of positive affect than prior generations. This tendency implies that, while the youth are aware of the issues they confront, they are adjusting to the existing environment. This adaptability is likely motivated by their growing receptivity to new thoughts.
LGBT Organizational Participation and LGBT Popular Culture
Participating in the umbrella association for several smaller Israel LGBTQ groups with more specific goals is one example of the growing liberal attitudes regarding LGBT rights. Aside from Otzma, the Aguda has a social services department and a Community and Pride Department. The social care department is responsible for conducting the “Someone to Speak To” hotline, which has prevented suicides and reduced the number of high-risk behaviors among the disadvantaged populations. Furthermore, the department operates the Bar-Noar Project, which promotes a healthy location for LGBT youth to share their thoughts and encounter other personnel like them and several other activities. The Rainbow Department organizes community and pride events such as Rosh Hashana and Passover meals. According to the objective statement, these activities “establish a link between equality and pride in daily life.” Individuals who are not required to serve in the IDF might volunteer in the Aguda as a type of public civil service, which is another embodiment of this idea (Ritchie, pg.618).
Furthermore, greater openness may be witnessed in Israel’s largest cities, such as Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Tel Aviv was named “the globe’s finest homosexual tourism city” in 2012, followed by places such as Toronto, New York City, Madrid, London, and Sao Paola, and it routinely leads such rankings. Drag culture is very popular; Israel’s “most renowned drag queen, Yisraelov Lior, has merged into popular culture. Lior was raised in a pious Zionist enclave in Tel Aviv and spent 12 years in a yeshiva, a Jewish religious institution. Yisrael showed his genuine nature during his final year. “When I first realized I was homosexual, I sat down every time and studied Talmud, Torah, Mishnah, and Gemara,” he explains. And you realize that somehow this is one of the strictly prohibited things in Judaism; hence you raise your eyes to the sky and ask the Almighty, “Why to make me into something you don’t like?” Lior has addressed these conflicts in his own life by completely embracing his role as a drag queen, marrying his lover, and becoming more secular.
Arizona, Lior’s sister, was the first transgender lady to wed a man in Israel under the huppah. Having an experienced mentor, according to Yisrael, was vital in his transition. Even if Arizona warmly accepts him, his two sisters were up in Haredi Orthodox households and are opposed to his misbehavior. “Why do I deserve this?” his mother wept when the baby was born. What did I do? What did I overlook? “What happened?” (Tobin). Conciliating traditional religious views to completely articulate one’s uniqueness is complex, even for the Yisraelov and Arizona families(Ritchie, pg.622).
Transgender Rights Trail “LGBT” Rights
As Arizona’s narrative is a major accomplishment and an example of transgender, rights of progress continue to trail behind homosexual rights in Israel since these challenges emerged much later. Until the Eurovision song contest was won in 1988 by a trans woman named Sharon, the concept of being “transgender” was completely unknown in Israel. Her historic victory led to a slew of further achievements, including her status as a worldwide transgender icon known as Dana International. Her success prompted the foundation of the “Miss Trans Israel” contest, a popular pageant that celebrates multiplicity (Hartal, pg.56).
Regardless of extensive lobbying attempts, Israel legislation remains anti-transgender. Nora Greenburg is a transgender campaign advocating for the ability of transgender persons to alter their identities without surgery and any other fundamental human rights. However, her efforts have yet to bear fruit. For instance, at the persuasion of Israel’s ultra-Orthodox health minister, a measure in the Knesset this would have secured homosexual people from hate crimes was pulled from contemplation in July 2016. The initiative, proposed by Amir Ohana, an openly homosexual Likud politician, would add “gender identity” to the list of hate crime targets. Health Minister and also an associate of the Unified Torah Judaism Party, however, knocked it down, claiming that the measure had no opportunity of being legalized. Furthermore, homosexual individuals cannot alter their identity documents without having sex reassignment surgery, and they cannot marry the opposite gender without the surgery. These legal limitations have far-reaching societal implications. Transgender Israelis, for instance, are unable to attend gender-separated homeless shelters (Ritchie, pg.635).
Opponents of Israel’s LGBT Advancement
The ultra-orthodox sector, the Haredim, which accounts for over 20% of Israeli Society and is quickly rising, is one of the most vocal opponents of the LGBT movement. Same-sex marriage is frowned upon by the Haredim since it violates a clear biblical ban. To’evah is the biblical term for homosexual intercourse, and the Talmud interprets it as a combination of to’eh atah bah, meaning “You have strayed.” Homophones weddings are not permitted in Israeli courts, and such unions are considered abominable by the Haredim. The Haredi community has always had representatives in the Knesset and has consistently voted against pro-LGBTQ legislation (Schulman, pg.181).
In 2005, Yishai Schlissel, an extremist Haredi, pierced three persons in Jerusalem Pride Parade, a stunningly horrifying incident that exemplified his tremendous perspective. Yishai was imprisoned for eleven years for his crime, frequently getting into conflicts with other convicts for his ideas. He disseminated a homophobic letter shortly after his release, in which he stated, ” Every Jew has a responsibility to protect his spirit from retribution and to halt the widespread desecration of God’s name.” Schlissel stabbed six additional persons in the 2015 Jerusalem Pride Parade days later. Shira Banki was one of the victims who passed away as a consequence. He had clearly not altered. Schlissel, like many Haredi who protests the yearly LGBT movements, felt he was only fulfilling God’s purpose.
Israelis were outraged by Schlissel’s actions, which underscored one of the many internal gaps that exist between Haredi and the reminder of the Israeli community. Because Jewish law prohibits murder, some Haredi had to examine themselves. Most Haredim, on the other hand, disagree with Gold, stating that Schlissel was probably mad and that his behaviors did not reflect the Society as a whole, particularly because Jewish halakhic law explicitly prohibits murder.
Several religious groups have succeeded in bringing back together with their religious faith and beliefs with their worries for human rights. Rabbi Avi Weiss expresses some of his beliefs in an essay where he refuses to perform homosexual marriages; he is a supporter of church-state division. He observes that a lack of a clear separation between church and state will eventually result in disadvantageous minority communities. Moreover, he says, “When I embrace openly people who do not obey Kashrut, family purity regulations, or Sabbath, I must also welcome, so much more, homophobic Jews, who are natural with their inclination. It is immoral and establishes a double standard to separate homosexuality from other biblical prohibitions.” Although Weiss is not a delegate of many observant rabbis, his recognition of one’s natural inclination without participating in wedding rites is one type of reconciliation(Schulman, pg.185).
Complaints from Israeli Activists About Government Support
In Israel, certain LGBT activist groups, such as the Haredi community, have made the opposite criticism. They raise concerns about the large amount of money spent on LGBT vacations compared to the limited amount of money dedicated to legitimate associations. In 2016, LGBT activists endangered to call off the annual Tel Aviv Pride Parade. The Tourism Ministry invested $3 million in the project, promoting “beautiful males, a great homosexual beach, and never-ending 24-hour nightlife” to entice foreign travelers. This sum was more than ten times what Israeli LGBTQ organizations receive each year. Disappointed and enraged, the management of the Israel LGBT Coalition insisted that tourism funds be redirected to LGBTQ outreach programs or the march be called off. The Tourism Ministry eventually halted the tourist budget, despite the fact that the majority of it had already been used up and the pared went forward as scheduled that year, and the government has subsequently adjusted budget line items to appease LGBT Movements (Shabi, pg.17).
Pinkwashing has been accused of Israel’s usage to present itself as the Middle East’s only contemporary democracy while portraying Palestinians as primitive and archaic for allegedly opposing LGBTQ rights. Gay rights, according to Aerial Gross, have effectively become a public-relations instrument. The establishment of the Israeli-Palestinian dichotomy also aims to delegitimize and discredit Palestinian grievances, particularly the ongoing Palestinian-Israel struggle over territory ownership. The concern is being heard at the most senior echelons of government. Politicians such as Benjamin routinely juxtapose Israeli LGBTQ accomplishments with Palestinian prejudice, stating that the rest of the Middle East is a “place where gays are hung, ladies are stoned, and Christians are tormented.” Most Israeli authorities, on the other hand, think that pinkwashing is overblown. They argue that over time, Israel has become more transgendered and that celebrations of LGBTQ rights and pride parades should not be seen unfavorably. Despite legitimate counter-arguments from people who do not believe in pinkwashing, the presence of homosexual troops and other frequently stated indicators showing the sincerity of LGBTQ rights in Israel remain inadequate markers of human rights(Ritchie, pg.639).
LGBT rights in Israel are undeniably among the most advanced in the area. Despite this, the movement has many detractors. Some, such as the Haredi, claim that the developments are bringing significant moral harm to Israel. Several members of the LGBT society claim that insufficient progress has been conducted: They believe that Israel engages in homosexual hospitality to systematically promote itself and legitimize its demands for Israeli land. Furthermore, being a significantly younger republic than the rest of Western Europe, Israel has experienced particular challenges such as security threats and rapid immigration. Despite these obstacles, LGBT progress has been remarkable—within a few decades, previously repressed residents have emerged from the shadows and are now openly celebrating their identities. Furthermore, Aguda’s lobbying prowess will very definitely guide to many more accomplishments in the future, including more backing for LGBTQ groups. Most issues will have to be addressed when these adjustments are implemented, particularly the difference between more secular and religious styles of thought. Overall, there is plenty to be excited about in terms of LGBT rights, as well as much true progress to be appreciated.
“Appendix: Brand Israel and Pinkwashing: A Documentary Guide.” Israel/Palestine and the Queer International, 2020, pp. 179-186.
Belkin, Aaron, and Melissa Levitt. “Homosexuality and the Israel Defense Forces: Did Lifting the Gay Ban Undermine Military Performance?” Armed Forces & Society, vol. 27, no. 4, 2001, pp. 541-565.
Crouse, C. “CHAPTER 3 Living Down and Out in New Orleans.” Down and Out in New Orleans, 2017, pp. 46-71.
Gilad, E. “Judaism and homosexuality: A brief history.” haaretz.com, 2 2016, www.haaretz.com/jewish/.premium.MAGAZINE-judaism-and-homosexuality-a-brief-history-1.5390687.
Hartal, G. “Israel’s LGBT movement and interest groups.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 2020, doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1295.
Izraeli, Dafna N. “Gendering Military Service in the Israel Defense Forces.” Stratification in Israel, 2019, pp. 281-312.
Kantor, L. “Why this Middle-Eastern country is one of the most LGBT-friendly cities in the world.” Culture Trip, 16 Mar. 2018, theculturetrip.com/middle-east/israel/articles/why-tel-aviv-is-one-of-the-most-lgbt-friendly-cities-in-the-world/.
“LGBTQ life in Israel.” Reform Judaism, 5 Apr. 2013, reformjudaism.org/beliefs-practices/israel-reform-judaism/lgbtq-life-israel.
Ritchie, Jason. “Pinkwashing, Homonationalism, and Israel-Palestine: The Conceits of Queer Theory and the Politics of the Ordinary.” Antipode, vol. 47, no. 3, 2014, pp. 616-634.
Schulman, S. “Israel and ‘Pinkwashing’.” The New York Times – Breaking News, US News, World News and Videos, 23 Nov. 2011, www.nytimes.com/2011/11/23/opinion/pinkwashing-and-israels-use-of-gays-as-a-messaging-tool.html.
Shabi, R. “Israel and the problem of pinkwashing.” Breaking News, World News and Video from Al Jazeera, 16 July 2015, www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/7/16/israel-the-rainbow-flag-and-the-pinkwashing-problem.
Stelder, M. “‘From the closet into the Knesset’: Zionist sexual politics and the formation of settler subjectivity.” Settler Colonial Studies, vol. 8, no. 4, 2017, pp. 442-463, doi:10.1080/2201473x.2017.1361885.
“Third place — A critical examination of Israeli LGBT advancements: Genuine progress or attempts at elevated global status?” The Yale Review of International Studies, 3 June 2018, yris.yira.org/acheson-prize/2453.